This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.
Can Casamigos live up to Diageo’s $1 billion pledge?
Adrian Clarke, founder of boutique investment company Delarki, weighs up whether George Clooney’s Casamigos Tequila can live up to Diageo’s $1 billion price tag.
When Diageo announced it had bought Casamigos for $1bn its share price fell by 1.05% overnight. The acquisition is reminiscent of inflated company valuations we are used to seeing in Silicon Valley.
With Diageo seemingly vastly overpaying for George Clooney’s upmarket Tequila brand, has ‘hype investment’ arrived in the spirits industry?
In the UK, Tequila sales have increased by 37% in the last two years. The US has seen a similar thirst with super-premium Tequila sales up 292% since 2002.
Diageo already had Don Julio and DeLéon – another celebrity partnership venture with P Diddy – but was missing a super premium Tequila brand in its drinks cabinet to capitalise on the growing ‘sipping’ trend in this lucrative category.
The Casamigos acquisition therefore makes perfect sense, but is it worth the price tag? According to Diageo, Casamigos is on track to sell 170,000 12-bottle cases this year.
Assuming that each bottle is able to deliver a $10 profit, that means a total potential windfall of $20.4 million this year.
That is a considerable profit, but hardly enough to justify the $1bn valuation (even double that would see this acquisition overvalued according to this metric).
However, marketers will argue that the ‘Clooney factor’ alone is worth its weight in gold. Clooney and his co-founders have made it clear that they will remain heavily involved in the brand.
A condition likely put forward by Diageo as part of the agreement that also stipulates payment will be made in two tranches: $700m upfront with the remaining $300m depending on performance over the next 10 years.
Clooney has been the face of some phenomenally successful branding campaigns in the past, including Martini and Nespresso. It is unknown how much his involvement will move the needle at this stage.
Drinks brands need to connect with the coveted millennial demographic to be successful in the long term. It’s doubtful that Clooney’s ‘silver fox’ persona will resonate with this audience.
Having said that, celebrity-endorsed brands often find more success from their influence behind the scenes.
An example of this is P Diddy, who was the face (and part owner) of Diageo’s best-selling premium vodka brand, Ciroc.
The partnership certainly helped, but it was P Diddy’s influence in getting Ciroc mentioned in many chart-topping songs that delivered real traction for the brand.
If Clooney can bring to bear his influence on Hollywood and far beyond then perhaps Casamigos will make some headway.
Clooney’s Tequila brand will have to work hard on creating exponentially accelerated growth to earn their current valuation price.
In that it will hardly differ from a Silicon Valley startup, which has to scale quickly to survive. In the tech space, valuations that outpace revenue streams and profit margins have become the norm.
The most polemic example being Uber reporting losses in the billions last year, yet is currently valued at $69 billion.
Even Amazon has barely made a profit in 15 years and yet they are currently valued at $483 billion market cap.
Whether this model is sustainable is up for debate, but these valuations are being justified because of their future potential as these brands become ever more ubiquitous in our lives.
Even so, this kind of ‘goodwill’ does not translate to the spirits industry so easily. We can spend all day whiling away hours, or run a business on our smartphones, but there is a limit to how much alcohol we consume in a day.
Also, millennials tend to value obscure craft brands and experiences over mainstream products.
This means that new brands must grow ever more subtly. Casamigos’ age and association with Clooney’s celebrity status automatically undermines its authenticity in the eyes of the millennial consumer, especially when compared to older family-owned Mexican brands.
It seems the only avenue left for Casamigos to achieve fast growth is to become the bartender’s ingredient of choice in Tequila-based cocktails. Almost to the point that consumers end up drinking it without even realising.
Can Diageo make this happen with Clooney and co’s three-year involvement? They might, but it will be challenging to add over $1bn to the balance sheet before bartenders adopt the next big thing in Tequila.
If not, this acquisition might resemble the sort of hype-fuelled investment gamble we are so used to seeing in tech. Let’s just hope that Casamigos won’t go the same way as Powa Technologies or Fling.
I’m very happy for them, when you have money everything is easy
Mr Clooney Gaviota Tequila is up for sale let’s make another brand for Diagio
As soon as I saw the news I was astonished. It’s completely ludicrous! So at the current rate of sales it’ll take Diageo 35 years just to break even on the 700 million. As you have said, current consumers of Casamigos will be dead by then, George will be dead by then and anyone who cared about George Clooney who’s still alive probably won’t be drinking Tequila. Who know what we’ll be drinking in 35 years let alone the next 5. One aspect when investing is the resale value, should you decide to “flip it” and trade up, Casamigos will never be worth more than 1 billion. Never. Also, putting Amazon in the mix, 10 billion for Whole Foods seems like a much more logical investment than 1 billion on Tequila. In Spain, where I live, nobody’s drinking Tequila. Scotch is back in fashion here and how many premium Scotch labels could they have bought with 1 billion? It’s a loser deal and if I were a shareholder I would also be seriously considering where my money is spent.