This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.
News
Trial of Burgundian producer begins
The trial of a Burgundian producer who has refused to spray his vines against flavescence dorée because he practices biodynamics begins today.
Emmanuel Giboulot is expected in a Dijon courtroom today (24 February) and faces a fine and even a short prison sentence for defying the ministry of agriculture’s instructions.
Following the discovery of flavesence dorée in the south of Burgundy last June, the ministry of agriculture told growers across the region to spray their vines with pesticides just in case the disease carriers – leaf hopper insects (pictured) – were moving north.
Most growers complied but Giboulot, who makes wine near Beaune, refused as the treatment would contradict his biodynamic principles which he has stuck by since the 1970s and he is sure his vines will be able to resist the disease naturally, should it migrate as far north as the Côte d’Or.
The ministry of agriculture has argued that Giboulot’s refusal to comply with its instruction is the equivalent of “refusing to be vaccinated” in the event of a major epidemic.
If Giboulot loses his case he faces up to six months in prison and a €300,000 fine.
His cause has elicited much support and an internet petition launched by l’Institut pour la Protection de la Santé Naturelle (IPSN), has already gained over 400,000 signatures.
Protestors will apparently hold a picnic outside the court in Beaune in support of Giboulot.
Flavesence dorée first surfaced in France in Armagnac in 1949 and has since spread to every vineyard region save the Jura, Alsace and Champagne. There is no known treatment for it save killing the carriers with pesticides and all infected plants have to be uprooted and burned.
Guys i think that you are talking about Emmanuel Giboulot right? (Check the sp)
I’ll take hard science any day of the week over Steiner. This guy’s hippie hocus pocus poses a very real potential danger to his neighbors, plain and simple.
What you call “hippie hocus pocus” has been used for centuries in Europe to grow wine and other crops. This isn’t something that came out of the Haight-Ashbury in the 60s. Europeans for centuries used no pesticides and dry-farmed their vineyards. This is no different. The only difference is it has a name now.
So, Josh, you’ve got 40 years’ experience of “hard science?” Doubtless the same as those who prescribed antibiotics for everything under the sun, and now find them increasingly ineffective. And don’t the beaurocrats in the Ministry always know best?
Does the desease only affect the plant, the carrier sat on? Or does it then spread by itself from one plant to the other?
If it is the latter, then the trial is understandable, as neighbours are put at risk too.
If it is the former, then I don’t understand the problem, as it’s the accused grower’s risk only.
@Rupart Millar, over 40,000 signatures? Well, that isn’t exactly mistaken. It’s over 500,000 signatures, just fyi.
http://les5duvin.wordpress.com/2014/02/25/what-is-the-extent-of-the-power-of-social-media-in-the-wine-world/